A large ship under construction in a dry dock, with exposed hull sections, cranes, scaffolding and small teams at work

Catch the mismatch before it becomes rework

A design assumption can travel through thousands of parts before a physical test exposes it. Semogram helps engineers compare simulations with measured performance and examine where a change or failure could affect the larger system.

AI-generated engineering scene

Find where the design behaves differently

Compare simulation with physical tests under matching loads, conditions and configurations

Understand what a revision changes

Examine design alternatives against performance requirements and test results before choosing a revision

Give a failure warning a physical basis

Evaluate potential failure risk using load histories, sensor readings and inspections

Investigate the fault in its system context

Bring component histories, anomalies and test conditions together to examine possible root causes

Define what a better outcome looks like

Which design assumptions stop holding under real operating conditions?

Start with a fair comparison
Choose a configuration and test regime, with acceptance criteria and a comparison baseline agreed by the engineering team
Keep the decision in view
Inspect discrepancies against loads and component histories, then record the design, model or inspection change chosen
Measure the result
Track prediction error, test failures and discrepancies that persist after revisions. Review rework hours and repeated failures against the changes made
Plan your first evaluation ↗
Test measurementsSimulation runsDesign contextInvestigate anomaliesPredict performanceMeasured outcomes